-* Joerg Jaspert/ftpteam
-* Peter Palfrader
-
-
-== data.d.o ==
-
-A service by ftpmaster to host larger arch-all packages for datasets like
-scientific databases (e.g. RCSB PDB, a database of protein structures) or
-datasets for games.
-
-This service could (and probably should) share hardware with snapshot.
-
-Proposers:
-
-* ftpteam/Joerg Jaspert
-
-
-== new debian mail setup ==
-
-A set of systems that will handle all incoming mail for all debian systems.
-Currently our incoming mail handling is on the individual host hosting a
-service, i.e. on master.debian.org for @debian.org, on bugs.debian.org for the
-bug tracking system, on lists.debian.org for our mailinglists and on several
-other systems for their individual, smaller email traffic.
-
-Centralizing email handling will allow us to maintain our anti-spam measures in
-a single point, avoiding duplicate work and hopefully improving our success.
-
-Requirements:
-
-* Four or so systems, in at least two different locations, capable of handling
- modern anti-spam software. This probably needs a bit of CPU.
-* remote management stuff
-
-Proposers:
-
-* Martin Zobel-Helas
-* Stephen Gran
-
-We probably have sufficient hardware for this. Current plan involves using one
-new box from HP, murphy, a new old sparc that zobel gets from some place, and
-puccini that will soon no longer have packages on it.
-
-== new bugs.d.o ==
-
-Currently bugs runs on a single DL385g1 system which cannot keep up with the
-load that the BTS causes.
-
-Owner@bugs would like to split the BTS accross multiple hosts: two for incoming
-email and spam filtering (would not be required if we had the setup mentioned
-above), one master, and at least two user-facing web servers.
-
-Requirements (assuming the above mentioned mail system is in place, else add
-two mail servers):
-
-* two systems with fast disks (we don't need that much storage, some 200 gigs
- should suffice easily for a while - say 4x140 gig raid10), some ram for
- caching (say 16g?), and the CPU to handle the scripts (if we can get two quad
- cores per box that would be great)
-* one master that processes incoming email, changing bugs as required, and
- pushes the changes to the web facing servers
-
-Proposers:
-
-* Don Armstrong
-
-If the snapshot hosts go through we might be able to put the bugs front end
-webservers on them too. Probably a question of load but it can't hardly be
-worse than rietz at the moment.
-
-
-== merge.d.o ==
-
-I'd like to use Ubuntu's merge-o-matic to generate diffs between Debian's
-source archive and the source archives of various other Debian-based distros
-(Knoppix, Freespire, Mepis, Sidux, gNewSense and so on). The result will be
-much like patches.ubuntu.com. merge-o-matic downloads source packages, unpacks
-them and generates diffs against unpacked pure debian source packages. As a
-result lots of disk space would be required since the whole Debian archive plus
-an unpacked version of it and the same for each derivative distribution is
-needed.
-
-Requirements:
-
-* a system with sufficient disk space (how much is that?)
-
-Proposers:
-
-* Paul Wise
-
-
-== source.debian.org ==
-
-Idea: A machine which has all sources extracted from orig.tar.gz + diff applied for all dists.
-
-Requirements:
-
-* a system with sufficient disk space (how much is that?)
-
-Proposers:
-
-* Noel Koethe