-## downloaded 2012-02-09 from ftp://time.nist.gov/pub/leap-seconds.list by weasel
+### downloaded 2014-12-20 from https://www.ietf.org/timezones/data/leap-seconds.list by weasel
#
# In the following text, the symbol '#' introduces
-# a comment, which continues from that symbol until
+# a comment, which continues from that symbol until
# the end of the line. A plain comment line has a
# whitespace character following the comment indicator.
-# There are also special comment lines defined below.
-# A special comment will always have a non-whitespace
+# There are also special comment lines defined below.
+# A special comment will always have a non-whitespace
# character in column 2.
#
# A blank line should be ignored.
# are transmitted by almost all time services.
#
# The first column shows an epoch as a number of seconds
-# since 1900.0 and the second column shows the number of
-# seconds that must be added to UTC to compute TAI for
-# any timestamp at or after that epoch. The value on
-# each line is valid from the indicated initial instant
-# until the epoch given on the next one or indefinitely
-# into the future if there is no next line.
+# since 1 January 1900, 00:00:00 (1900.0 is also used to
+# indicate the same epoch.) Both of these time stamp formats
+# ignore the complexities of the time scales that were
+# used before the current definition of UTC at the start
+# of 1972. (See note 3 below.)
+# The second column shows the number of seconds that
+# must be added to UTC to compute TAI for any timestamp
+# at or after that epoch. The value on each line is
+# valid from the indicated initial instant until the
+# epoch given on the next one or indefinitely into the
+# future if there is no next line.
# (The comment on each line shows the representation of
-# the corresponding initial epoch in the usual
+# the corresponding initial epoch in the usual
# day-month-year format. The epoch always begins at
# 00:00:00 UTC on the indicated day. See Note 5 below.)
-#
+#
# Important notes:
#
# 1. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) is often referred to
# longer used, and the use of GMT to designate UTC is
# discouraged.
#
-# 2. The UTC time scale is realized by many national
+# 2. The UTC time scale is realized by many national
# laboratories and timing centers. Each laboratory
# identifies its realization with its name: Thus
# UTC(NIST), UTC(USNO), etc. The differences among
# by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures
# (BIPM). See www.bipm.fr for more information.
#
-# 3. The current defintion of the relationship between UTC
-# and TAI dates from 1 January 1972. A number of different
-# time scales were in use before than epoch, and it can be
-# quite difficult to compute precise timestamps and time
+# 3. The current definition of the relationship between UTC
+# and TAI dates from 1 January 1972. A number of different
+# time scales were in use before that epoch, and it can be
+# quite difficult to compute precise timestamps and time
# intervals in those "prehistoric" days. For more information,
# consult:
#
# of Time," Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 79, pp. 894-905,
# July, 1991.
#
-# 4. The insertion of leap seconds into UTC is currently the
-# responsibility of the International Earth Rotation Service,
-# which is located at the Paris Observatory:
-#
-# Central Bureau of IERS
-# 61, Avenue de l'Observatoire
-# 75014 Paris, France.
+# 4. The decision to insert a leap second into UTC is currently
+# the responsibility of the International Earth Rotation and
+# Reference Systems Service. (The name was changed from the
+# International Earth Rotation Service, but the acronym IERS
+# is still used.)
#
-# Leap seconds are announced by the IERS in its Bulletin C
+# Leap seconds are announced by the IERS in its Bulletin C.
#
-# See hpiers.obspm.fr or www.iers.org for more details.
+# See www.iers.org for more details.
#
-# All national laboratories and timing centers use the
-# data from the BIPM and the IERS to construct their
-# local realizations of UTC.
+# Every national laboratory and timing center uses the
+# data from the BIPM and the IERS to construct UTC(lab),
+# their local realization of UTC.
#
# Although the definition also includes the possibility
-# of dropping seconds ("negative" leap seconds), this has
-# never been done and is unlikely to be necessary in the
+# of dropping seconds ("negative" leap seconds), this has
+# never been done and is unlikely to be necessary in the
# foreseeable future.
#
# 5. If your system keeps time as the number of seconds since
# some epoch (e.g., NTP timestamps), then the algorithm for
# assigning a UTC time stamp to an event that happens during a positive
-# leap second is not well defined. The official name of that leap
-# second is 23:59:60, but there is no way of representing that time
-# in these systems.
-# Many systems of this type effectively stop the system clock for
-# one second during the leap second and use a time that is equivalent
-# to 23:59:59 UTC twice. For these systems, the corresponding TAI
+# leap second is not well defined. The official name of that leap
+# second is 23:59:60, but there is no way of representing that time
+# in these systems.
+# Many systems of this type effectively stop the system clock for
+# one second during the leap second and use a time that is equivalent
+# to 23:59:59 UTC twice. For these systems, the corresponding TAI
# timestamp would be obtained by advancing to the next entry in the
# following table when the time equivalent to 23:59:59 UTC
# is used for the second time. Thus the leap second which
#
# If your system realizes the leap second by repeating 00:00:00 UTC twice
# (this is possible but not usual), then the advance to the next entry
-# in the table must occur the second time that a time equivlent to
+# in the table must occur the second time that a time equivalent to
# 00:00:00 UTC is used. Thus, using the same example as above:
#
# ...
# ...
#
# in both cases the use of timestamps based on TAI produces a smooth
-# time scale with no discontinuity in the time interval.
-#
-# This complexity would not be needed for negative leap seconds (if they
-# are ever used). The UTC time would skip 23:59:59 and advance from
-# 23:59:58 to 00:00:00 in that case. The TAI offset would decrease by
-# 1 second at the same instant. This is a much easier situation to deal
-# with, since the difficulty of unambiguously representing the epoch
+# time scale with no discontinuity in the time interval. However,
+# although the long-term behavior of the time scale is correct in both
+# methods, the second method is technically not correct because it adds
+# the extra second to the wrong day.
+#
+# This complexity would not be needed for negative leap seconds (if they
+# are ever used). The UTC time would skip 23:59:59 and advance from
+# 23:59:58 to 00:00:00 in that case. The TAI offset would decrease by
+# 1 second at the same instant. This is a much easier situation to deal
+# with, since the difficulty of unambiguously representing the epoch
# during the leap second does not arise.
#
# Questions or comments to:
# Time and Frequency Division
# NIST
# Boulder, Colorado
-# jlevine@boulder.nist.gov
+# Judah.Levine@nist.gov
#
# Last Update of leap second values: 11 January 2012
#
-# The following line shows this last update date in NTP timestamp
+# The following line shows this last update date in NTP timestamp
# format. This is the date on which the most recent change to
# the leap second data was added to the file. This line can
-# be identified by the unique pair of characters in the first two
+# be identified by the unique pair of characters in the first two
# columns as shown below.
#
#$ 3535228800
#
# The NTP timestamps are in units of seconds since the NTP epoch,
-# which is 1900.0. The Modified Julian Day number corresponding
-# to the NTP time stamp, X, can be computed as
+# which is 1 January 1900, 00:00:00. The Modified Julian Day number
+# corresponding to the NTP time stamp, X, can be computed as
#
# X/86400 + 15020
#
-# where the first term converts seconds to days and the second
-# term adds the MJD corresponding to 1900.0. The integer portion
-# of the result is the integer MJD for that day, and any remainder
-# is the time of day, expressed as the fraction of the day since 0
-# hours UTC. The conversion from day fraction to seconds or to
-# hours, minutes, and seconds may involve rounding or truncation,
-# depending on the method used in the computation.
+# where the first term converts seconds to days and the second
+# term adds the MJD corresponding to the time origin defined above.
+# The integer portion of the result is the integer MJD for that
+# day, and any remainder is the time of day, expressed as the
+# fraction of the day since 0 hours UTC. The conversion from day
+# fraction to seconds or to hours, minutes, and seconds may involve
+# rounding or truncation, depending on the method used in the
+# computation.
#
-# The data in this file will be updated periodically as new leap
+# The data in this file will be updated periodically as new leap
# seconds are announced. In addition to being entered on the line
-# above, the update time (in NTP format) will be added to the basic
+# above, the update time (in NTP format) will be added to the basic
# file name leap-seconds to form the name leap-seconds.<NTP TIME>.
-# In addition, the generic name leap-seconds.list will always point to
+# In addition, the generic name leap-seconds.list will always point to
# the most recent version of the file.
#
# This update procedure will be performed only when a new leap second
-# is announced.
+# is announced.
#
# The following entry specifies the expiration date of the data
-# in this file in units of seconds since 1900.0. This expiration date
-# will be changed at least twice per year whether or not a new leap
-# second is announced. These semi-annual changes will be made no
-# later than 1 June and 1 December of each year to indicate what
-# action (if any) is to be taken on 30 June and 31 December,
+# in this file in units of seconds since the origin at the instant
+# 1 January 1900, 00:00:00. This expiration date will be changed
+# at least twice per year whether or not a new leap second is
+# announced. These semi-annual changes will be made no later
+# than 1 June and 1 December of each year to indicate what
+# action (if any) is to be taken on 30 June and 31 December,
# respectively. (These are the customary effective dates for new
# leap seconds.) This expiration date will be identified by a
# unique pair of characters in columns 1 and 2 as shown below.
-# In the unlikely event that a leap second is announced with an
+# In the unlikely event that a leap second is announced with an
# effective date other than 30 June or 31 December, then this
# file will be edited to include that leap second as soon as it is
# announced or at least one month before the effective date
-# (whichever is later).
-# If an announcement by the IERS specifies that no leap second is
-# scheduled, then only the expiration date of the file will
+# (whichever is later).
+# If an announcement by the IERS specifies that no leap second is
+# scheduled, then only the expiration date of the file will
# be advanced to show that the information in the file is still
-# current -- the update time stamp, the data and the name of the file
+# current -- the update time stamp, the data and the name of the file
# will not change.
#
-# Updated through IERS Bulletin C43
-# File expires on: 28 Dec 2012
+# Updated through IERS Bulletin C48
+# File expires on: 28 June 2015
#
-#@ 3565641600
+#@ 3644438400
#
2272060800 10 # 1 Jan 1972
2287785600 11 # 1 Jul 1972
3124137600 32 # 1 Jan 1999
3345062400 33 # 1 Jan 2006
3439756800 34 # 1 Jan 2009
-3550089600 35 # 1 Jul 2012
+3550089600 35 # 1 Jul 2012
#
# the following special comment contains the
# hash value of the data in this file computed
# computed. Note that the hash computation
# ignores comments and whitespace characters
# in data lines. It includes the NTP values
-# of both the last modification time and the
+# of both the last modification time and the
# expiration time of the file, but not the
# white space on those lines.
# the hash line is also ignored in the
# computation.
#
-#h 914ea332 e06ddca8 7c65c64f ff579ff8 68b07a49
+#h a4862ccd c6f43c6 964f3604 85944a26 b5cfad4e