X-Git-Url: https://git.adam-barratt.org.uk/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=input%2Fhardware-wishlist.creole;h=b54c057347dccd1bb31f412aa9168f27be4628c6;hb=b77cf64bc3f9989f6b445f36b310278f21329bec;hp=8522fbe7dab38107678b79cc53473330e0863d5f;hpb=41ab130d329d547ea0f8d518b9f450f35d465a9d;p=mirror%2Fdsa-wiki.git diff --git a/input/hardware-wishlist.creole b/input/hardware-wishlist.creole index 8522fbe..b54c057 100644 --- a/input/hardware-wishlist.creole +++ b/input/hardware-wishlist.creole @@ -36,33 +36,6 @@ Proposers: * ftpteam/Joerg Jaspert -== new bugs.d.o == - -Currently bugs runs on a single DL385g1 system which cannot keep up with the -load that the BTS causes. - -Owner@bugs would like to split the BTS accross multiple hosts: two for incoming -email and spam filtering (would not be required if we had the setup mentioned -above), one master, and at least two user-facing web servers. - -Requirements (assuming the above mentioned mail system is in place, else add -two mail servers): - -* two systems with fast disks (we don't need that much storage, some 200 gigs - should suffice easily for a while - say 4x140 gig raid10), some ram for - caching (say 16g?), and the CPU to handle the scripts (if we can get two quad - cores per box that would be great) -* one master that processes incoming email, changing bugs as required, and - pushes the changes to the web facing servers - -Proposers: - -* Don Armstrong - -If the snapshot hosts go through we might be able to put the bugs front end -webservers on them too. Probably a question of load but it can't hardly be -worse than rietz at the moment. - == merge.d.o == @@ -96,26 +69,6 @@ Proposers: * Noel Koethe -== new ftp-master == - -ftp-master's hardware is becoming old and warranty is running out (we keep extending it, but that's not for free either). - -We probably should look into getting a new machine somewhere in the US. Apart -from recent CPUs, reasonable amount of ram (16-32g?) and the usual management -fu primary requirement is reliable storage. We probably should look at some -raid6, either internal or external for the master copy of the archive in the range -of 2-4T (is that right, ftp folks?). Additionally some faster internal storage -could be useful for the database part of the ftp archive (4 disks raid10?). - -== new backup.d.o == - -bartok, the current backup.d.o, is getting old too, and there is not all that -much spare space. - -We should be looking at replacing that eventually. A raid6 of big SATA disks -would probably provide the required robustness and be cost-effective. - - = Historical = These proposals probably are no longer relevant: @@ -156,3 +109,53 @@ everywhere, at least some of the reasons for this proposal are no longer valid. It still might make sense to eventually move @debian.org mail from master to a new system but we don't need 4 dedicated hosts for that, probably. (weasel) +== new bugs.d.o == + +Currently bugs runs on a single DL385g1 system which cannot keep up with the +load that the BTS causes. + +Owner@bugs would like to split the BTS accross multiple hosts: two for incoming +email and spam filtering (would not be required if we had the setup mentioned +above), one master, and at least two user-facing web servers. + +Requirements (assuming the above mentioned mail system is in place, else add +two mail servers): + +* two systems with fast disks (we don't need that much storage, some 200 gigs + should suffice easily for a while - say 4x140 gig raid10), some ram for + caching (say 16g?), and the CPU to handle the scripts (if we can get two quad + cores per box that would be great). +* one master that processes incoming email, changing bugs as required, and + pushes the changes to the web facing servers. + +Proposers: + +* Don Armstrong + +If the snapshot hosts go through we might be able to put the bugs front end +webservers on them too. Probably a question of load but it can't hardly be +worse than rietz at the moment. + +Status (2009-05-04): + +We were quite successful in using other hosts as bugs web mirrors (even if +right now we aren't running any due to other hardware failing), so that is +a more or less solved problem. We also intent to move bugs-master to a kvm +domain at ubc/ece once the blade there is fixed. And we can probably move +incoming MX to a blade instance in darmstadt and another one at the same +place as new bugs-master will be if the bugs folks still want that. + +== new ftp-master == + +ftp-master's hardware is becoming old and warranty is running out (we keep extending it, but that's not for free either). + +We probably should look into getting a new machine somewhere in the US. Apart +from recent CPUs, reasonable amount of ram (16-32g?) and the usual management +fu primary requirement is reliable storage. We probably should look at some +raid6, either internal or external for the master copy of the archive in the range +of 2-4T (is that right, ftp folks?). Additionally some faster internal storage +could be useful for the database part of the ftp archive (4 disks raid10?). + +Status (2010-05-20): + +HP DL380 G6 machine in place at CS Dept. Brown University. In setup